Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Show more types:

Reply

 Deletedanswered…5yrs5Y

No. Some of the concepts are good in theory, but the lack of competition is driving up the costs and decreasing the quality.

 @6WS2R4W from Pennsylvania  answered…5yrs5Y

No, it effectively did nothing to decrease the costs of healthcare to the middle class

 @8C9RYD7 from Ohio  answered…5yrs5Y

no because universal health care sounds good but then doctors wont work as hard and you wont get treated as good.

 @8CQFL7Zanswered…5yrs5Y

 @8DDZVTX from California  answered…5yrs5Y

 Deletedanswered…5yrs5Y

 @7RGBCQB from Alabama  answered…5yrs5Y

No, we need a single payer, or another system like what France, Singapore, or even Japan has. The U.S. ranks last with healthcare compared to other developed countries.

 @7Z65922 from Georgia  answered…5yrs5Y

  @8DN4WYN from Pennsylvania  answered…5yrs5Y

The government should encourage a "free market" in healthcare. As an attorney who spent a number of years representing hospitals the over-regulation of insurance has actually resulted in absurdly additive healthcare costs for administrative purposes. Any further expansion into healthcare by the government is actually counterproductive and will not reduce healthcare costs. When has the government ever taken control of a part of the economy and actually made it fair or equitable? Never...

 @8FC4KWY from North Carolina  answered…5yrs5Y

I think health care should just be affordable becasue it´s too expensive

 @8FPPV32answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, but only if it's not mandatory. Mandating health coverage is not freedom and is unconstitutional

 @8FVBGSVanswered…5yrs5Y

Yes but the healthcare system should be overhauled. There should be free universal health care but people should also be able to pay for private healthcare.

 @riddlecongress from Connecticut  answered…5yrs5Y

No, open the markets so insurers can compete across state lines and reduce costs, but I support protecting pre-existing conditions.

 @2HN4HSXanswered…5yrs5Y

No, I support the spirit of the plan, giving everyone helthcare. However, forcing a product on the population by government mandate with the consequences of fines or even jailtime is unconstitutional and immoral.

 @78S5M87 from Wisconsin  answered…5yrs5Y

open the markets so insurers can compete across state lines and reduce costs

 @8GJ3NJZanswered…5yrs5Y

 @8GT6F2C from Texas  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8HDSRSL from Pennsylvania  answered…5yrs5Y

No. Prier to the ACA, those with pre-existing conditions could get health insurance with their state's High Risk pool. The cost was income based, so it was affordable. The system needed education, not overhaul.

 @38LNC72answered…5yrs5Y

No, either making a universal health care for all -or- open the markets so insurers can compete across state lines and reduce costs. Either would be better as the system we have is anti-competitive with big giveaways to Pharma/Insurance which is why Americans pay more than any other country for health care.

 @8HJ6ZY7 from Texas  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8HQ887F from Texas  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, in the aspect that I support the ideals it's working towards-that we shouldn't hide healthcare behind greed- but it might not be the most effective way of doing it.

 @8HQ9Y3F from North Carolina  answered…5yrs5Y

No, the only good thing is the way they handle preexisting conditions besides that I don't support it especially the tax when you don't have healthcare.

 @8JBXLPD from Montana  answered…5yrs5Y

The U.S. health care system is terrible. We should adopt a free healthcare system similar to many other countries.

 @8JXC89N from California  answered…5yrs5Y

Obama care is still very expensive and the people that need it could not be able to afford it.

 @8K2J6K3answered…5yrs5Y

Government subsidised health care is a good idea but shouldnt be forced upon the people. The option for privatised health care and public is important.

 @8JQ6GH5 from Illinois  answered…5yrs5Y

Allow states to voluntarily enter a single payer system, while allowing private insurance companies to compete across state lines. Only states that enter the SPS contribute, absorbs people under the ACA. Break up large insurance companies that benefitted drastically under the ACA. The ACA killed competition.

 @8K4ZGWFanswered…5yrs5Y

The government should establish a National Health System the way the United Kingdom has.

 @7Y67TWY from Florida  answered…5yrs5Y

More Important to lower the price of healthcare procedures to make insurance more attainable for all.

 @Davidc0302 from Oregon  answered…5yrs5Y

 @Davidc0302 from Oregon  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8L9P7P3 from GU  answered…5yrs5Y

I support it, but private healthcare should also be allowed. It should be a balance of private and public healthcare.

 @8LHBBC5 from Pennsylvania  answered…5yrs5Y

i support its goal but some aspects of the plan are a little wishy-washy for me, I need to learn more about it

 @8LN4JNK from Pennsylvania  answered…5yrs5Y

Obama-Care isn't the greatest, Everything they stand for i'll stand for. I disagree with the mandate because people like private insurances plus the fact the premiums went up but I think as Hillary Cilton said "We should improve obama-care"

 @8LZKM6Tanswered…5yrs5Y

Government provided health care when individuals can't get it is and was a great idea. Make it mandatory was a failure as we have seen. Many major Government programs have issues (SS and the VA) why do we think we will pull this off in any other fashion.

 @8MCVG8W from Michigan  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8F8YSKT from Ohio  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8MGM3YP from New York  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8MNYGHJanswered…5yrs5Y

yes i do support it but i think the goverment should charge more people tax dollars for reduced costing health care

 @8MQ5M2Hanswered…5yrs5Y

 @8N2K6Z7 from Michigan  answered…5yrs5Y

I think healthcare should be free for all people currently working in the U.S

 @8NHKV7D from Pennsylvania  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, but it should not be the only option and it should be reformed so that every aspect of it is constitutional.

 @6HDD83R from California  answered…5yrs5Y

- Support free and public healthcare (for those who qualify)
- Officially nationalize all health institutions, where the employees of said health institutions are government employees.
- The U.S. government shall only support any medical procedures with a success rate of 51% or higher
- The U.S. federal government shall cover 50% of the cost of healthcare (while the states, U.S. territories, and Washington D.C., shall cover for the other 50%).
- Only essential and/or beneficial medical procedures (both surgical and non-surgical) shall be covered by the state
- Taxes, tariffs, fees, profi…  Read more

 @kgtiberius from Wisconsin  answered…5yrs5Y

I support the concept but not the implementation. Create a split system where basic needs and medicine are provided by our military facilities and more advanced or elective medical needs (such as cancer, cosmetic surgery, or personal choice of doctors) should be private insurance.

 @8NRQS6Z from Nevada  answered…5yrs5Y

I support parts of the plan but not all aspects. The government should fix the faults that it had instead of replacing it.

 @BiiiigOlTitties from Illinois  answered…5yrs5Y

Obamacare only adds more bureaucracy. We should have a Medicare For All type program which has taxes to penalize unhealthy behaviors, which cost our healthcare system much more than preexisting conditions do.

 @RyanGe25 from New York  answered…5yrs5Y

 @MilesBHuff from Michigan  answered…5yrs5Y

 @7W3SBDC from Florida  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, but there is a lot of needed improvement. ACA should be competing with private insurance and vise verse, this will keep prices in-check.

 @8PBY8XC from Florida  answered…5yrs5Y

I support the idea, but I would also like for citizens to have the option to have their own private healthcare accounts.

 @88LK76J from Michigan  answered…5yrs5Y

 @68QRLZT from Louisiana  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, I believe it is a good start, but I would like to work towards establishing a healthcare system similar to Germany's healthcare system

 @8PM9QDT from Iowa  answered…5yrs5Y

Universal Healthcare is the best way to go. We pay taxes or go to jail. Use our taxes for healthcare for all citizens.

 @8PMF46F from Ohio  answered…5yrs5Y

I support government healthcare, but not a single mandate that requires a payment if an individual opts out. Our citizens deserve the right to private healthcare, but we need to be realistic that not everyone can access or afford that, and they need dependable and cheap healthcare

 @88LK76J from Michigan  answered…5yrs5Y

 @88LK76J from Michigan  answered…5yrs5Y

 @88LK76J from Michigan  answered…5yrs5Y

 @88LK76J from Michigan  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8Q8RMYM from Kentucky  answered…5yrs5Y

Obamacare has thrown an unbelievable amount of money down the drain, once again i support cheaper healthcare, but governments stimulating the system with unlimited money basically gives no incentive to lower costs without it.

 @6WHP7WC from Michigan  answered…5yrs5Y

No, but we should offer a national Public Option to compete with private insurance.

 @8QJQQGQ from Texas  answered…5yrs5Y

 @5643HNNanswered…5yrs5Y

Yes, but a combination of single-player and private organization would offer the most choices to all

 @6RW5J4M from Louisiana  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, but I prefer abolishing government insurance while mandating private insurance, paid via payroll taxes

 @8QNP2M5 from Maryland  answered…5yrs5Y

No, but programs should remain existing to help the poor. The free market does the best at deciding need let the market work with proper checks and balances.

 @8QNKSKF from Michigan  answered…5yrs5Y

This program is one of the worst programs Obama and his administration did . This has caused so many issues for citizens

 @8D5J4RR from Minnesota  answered…5yrs5Y

  @8R7JPB5 from Pennsylvania  answered…5yrs5Y

Healthcare is a necessity for a healthy life, we must begin looking at ways to remove the profit motive from healthcare.

 @8RB2K9D from New York  answered…5yrs5Y

No, and I prefer a single payer system like in many western european nations, with the option of private insurance

 @8RB2K9D from New York  answered…5yrs5Y

No, and I prefer a single payer system, with the option of private insurance

 @8RWY7B9 from Mississippi  answered…4yrs4Y

 Deletedanswered…4yrs4Y

 @8S3MMM2 from Texas  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes and no . Yes because this can cover there fees and even help those who are in need get the help they are seeking .No because why should a person pay for something like that , and why make it a law in the first place this can effect a person income and also sometimes the things they need .

 @7RGBCQB from Alabama  answered…4yrs4Y

No! It sucks. We should have an Australian system that has a mix of public and private healthcare.

 @6RW5J4M from Louisiana  answered…4yrs4Y

No, and I prefer abolishing government insurance while mandating private insurance, paid via payroll taxes

 @dandymananswered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but reduce regulations so insurers can compete across state lines and reduce costs

 Deletedanswered…4yrs4Y

No, create a public health insurance option for all citizens, and open the markets so insurers can compete across state lines.

 @87V5TYY from Connecticut  answered…4yrs4Y

  @8SZGMSH from Tennessee  answered…4yrs4Y

No, The government should create one national healthcare program, and each state would have its own local branch so that it will be more effective in every state.

 Deletedanswered…4yrs4Y

 Deletedanswered…4yrs4Y

 @8TCFY6L from Illinois  answered…4yrs4Y

I think there are better ways to do health care such as a free healthcare system.