President Obama recently declared that the U.S. will accept 10,000 refugees from Syria. The U.S. has been under pressure from its Syrian allies to help out with the crisis in which 3 Million refugees have fled Syria in the past year. Those in favor of accepting refugees believe that the U.S. has a duty to join its allies in Europe and accept at least 10,000 refugees. Opponents argue that the U.S. should stay out of this crisis and accepting refugees from the Middle East leads to a risk of letting terrorists into our borders.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Political party:
@92YTSSF3yrs3Y
Yes with background checks, and other careful ways of looking into their reason.
@6K36GJH4yrs4Y
They are trying to leave Syria. Yes.
@MilesBHuff4yrs4Y
No, we should never accept any refugees -- only proper immigrants
@8FPLGKD5yrs5Y
Yes, but not until after COVID has dropped in the United States and countries refugees have passed through.
@8RB2K9D4yrs4Y
Yes, we should accept 10,000 refugees, but only after extensive background checks and continuous monitoring to ensure they are not a threat
@8RB2K9D4yrs4Y
Yes, but only 5,000 refugees, and only after background checks
@8SW74HJ4yrs4Y
Only families, and extensive background checks be issued on those families.
@8TKFNNS4yrs4Y
Yes But Only Legally with proof of Travel Documents same thing with south america and every other country no diffrent in most cases 99 percent of the time.
@8TKFNNS4yrs4Y
Yes But Only Legally with proof of Travel Documents same thing with south america and every other country like Mexico no diffrrent in most cases 99 percent of the time.
@8TW7FNH4yrs4Y
Let them in the country with background checks but don’t use my money to pay for them.
@thomasjj03yrs3Y
No, make safe zones in these countries so no unwanted migrants come.
Join in on more popular conversations.
